Understanding the information displayed on sonar devices used in angling and boating activities is crucial for effective navigation and fish detection. This involves interpreting the visual representations of underwater objects, structures, and fish populations on the device’s screen. Deciphering these signals allows users to gain a better understanding of the underwater environment and improve their chances of locating desired fish species. For example, a dense cluster of returns on the display might indicate a school of baitfish, while a larger, more isolated return could represent a larger predator fish.
The ability to accurately interpret the data provided by these devices offers significant advantages to anglers and boaters. It enables more precise targeting of fishing locations, leading to increased catch rates and a more efficient use of time. Historically, experienced anglers relied on intuition and knowledge of local waters. Modern sonar technology provides a data-driven approach, supplementing traditional knowledge with real-time underwater information. This evolution has revolutionized recreational and commercial fishing practices.
The following sections will delve into the specifics of interpreting display elements, understanding frequency settings, and recognizing common underwater structures. These elements are crucial for accurately interpreting the data and maximizing the effectiveness of sonar technology for underwater exploration and fish location.
1. Fish arches
Fish arches represent a fundamental element in the interpretation of sonar data. Their formation stems from the movement of a fish within the sonar beam’s cone of coverage. As a fish enters the periphery of the cone, the sonar reflects off the fish, registering a signal. As the fish moves closer to the center of the cone, the reflected signal strengthens, culminating in the strongest return when the fish is directly under the transducer. As the fish exits the beam, the signal weakens again, resulting in an arc-shaped display. Therefore, the appearance of a complete or partial arc is indicative of a fish moving through the sonar’s detection area.
The quality and shape of the fish arch provide additional information. A full, well-defined arch typically signifies a fish moving at a relatively constant depth and speed. Incomplete or distorted arches can arise from fish moving quickly, changing depth, or the transducer’s settings being improperly adjusted. Understanding the correlation between the fish’s movement and the resulting arch on the display enables the user to differentiate between fish and other underwater objects. For example, a stationary object, such as a rock, will typically display as a straight line rather than an arch.
Accurate interpretation of fish arches requires practice and attention to detail. Factors such as boat speed, sonar frequency, and gain settings can influence the appearance of these arches. By mastering the recognition and analysis of fish arches, users can significantly improve their ability to locate and target fish, transforming raw sonar data into actionable intelligence for more successful fishing expeditions. Failure to understand the underlying cause of a fish arch leads to inaccurate assumptions and potential misidentification of other underwater structures.
2. Bottom Hardness
Bottom hardness, as displayed on a sonar device, provides critical information about the composition and density of the seabed. This data is valuable for understanding fish habitats, identifying productive fishing locations, and navigating safely. The echoes of sound waves bouncing off the bottom reveal the nature of the underwater terrain, which impacts the distribution and behavior of various fish species.
-
Signal Strength and Display Color
The strength of the sonar return signal is directly proportional to the hardness of the bottom. Harder surfaces, such as rock or gravel, reflect a greater amount of the sonar signal, resulting in a stronger return and typically displayed with brighter or more intense colors on the fish finder screen. Conversely, softer bottoms like mud or silt absorb more of the sonar signal, leading to a weaker return and displayed with dimmer colors. For instance, a bright red or orange indication often suggests a rocky bottom, while a faint blue or green usually denotes a muddy or silty seabed.
-
Bottom Contour and Texture
Variations in bottom hardness often correlate with changes in bottom contour and texture. Rocky bottoms are generally uneven and characterized by sharp changes in depth, indicated by jagged lines on the fish finder display. Softer bottoms tend to be smoother and more uniform, resulting in smoother lines on the display. Recognizing these patterns helps distinguish different bottom types and predict potential fish holding areas. A sudden transition from a soft bottom to a hard bottom can indicate a drop-off or ledge, a prime location for predatory fish.
-
Fish Species Preference
Different fish species exhibit preferences for specific bottom types. Bottom-dwelling species like flounder or halibut often favor softer, muddy bottoms where they can bury themselves for camouflage and ambush prey. Other species, such as bass or snapper, prefer harder, rocky bottoms that provide structure and cover from predators. Understanding these preferences allows anglers to target specific species by focusing their efforts on areas with the appropriate bottom characteristics. For example, if targeting walleye, an angler might focus on areas with gravel or rocky bottoms.
-
Implications for Anchoring and Navigation
Information about bottom hardness is also vital for safe anchoring and navigation. Knowing whether the bottom is rocky, sandy, or muddy helps determine the appropriate type of anchor to use and predict its holding power. Anchoring on a hard, rocky bottom may be difficult and could damage the anchor, while anchoring on a soft, muddy bottom might not provide sufficient holding power in strong currents or winds. Sonar readings of bottom hardness can also help identify potential hazards such as submerged rocks or debris, allowing boaters to avoid collisions and groundings.
In conclusion, the ability to accurately interpret bottom hardness data from a fish finder is an invaluable skill for anglers and boaters alike. By understanding the relationship between signal strength, bottom contour, fish species preference, and navigational implications, users can leverage this information to enhance their fishing success, improve their safety on the water, and gain a deeper appreciation for the underwater environment.
3. Structure Location
Identifying the position of underwater structures using sonar is crucial for successful angling and safe navigation. This skill, an essential component of effectively using a fish finder, involves interpreting visual data to determine the location of objects such as submerged trees, rock piles, and artificial reefs. Accurate structure location allows anglers to target areas where fish are likely to congregate and helps boaters avoid potential hazards.
-
Interpreting Signal Returns
Structure appears on a fish finder display as distinct anomalies in the bottom contour. Hard structures, like rock piles, produce strong signal returns, often depicted as bright, well-defined shapes. Softer structures, such as vegetation, may generate weaker, less distinct returns. The shape and intensity of these returns offer clues about the type and composition of the structure. Recognizing these visual cues requires understanding the relationship between the physical properties of the structure and the reflected sonar signals.
-
Utilizing GPS Integration
Many modern fish finders incorporate GPS technology, enabling users to mark and save the coordinates of identified structures. This functionality allows for precise return trips to productive fishing spots and helps create a comprehensive underwater map of known structure locations. The integration of GPS with sonar data significantly enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of structure location efforts.
-
Understanding Sonar Frequency and Range
The chosen sonar frequency and range settings influence the clarity and detail with which structures are displayed. Higher frequencies provide greater resolution but have a shorter range, making them suitable for detailed imaging of nearby structures. Lower frequencies offer a wider range but sacrifice some detail, useful for identifying larger structures at a distance. Proper frequency and range selection is critical for optimizing structure location efforts.
-
Differentiating Structure from Fish
Distinguishing between structure and fish can be challenging, but crucial for effective angling. Fish typically appear as moving targets or arches, while structures remain stationary. Observing the behavior of the sonar returns over time can help differentiate between the two. Additionally, some fish finders offer features like fish ID, which can help identify potential fish targets based on their sonar signatures, although this feature is not always accurate and requires careful interpretation.
The ability to accurately locate underwater structures, facilitated by understanding sonar principles and proper equipment usage, provides a significant advantage for both anglers and boaters. These skills, combined with experience and local knowledge, transform a fish finder from a simple device into a powerful tool for underwater exploration and fish identification.
4. Frequency selection
Optimal frequency selection is a fundamental aspect of interpreting sonar data effectively. The chosen frequency significantly impacts the detail, range, and clarity of the information displayed on the fish finder screen, directly influencing the user’s ability to identify underwater objects and fish populations.
-
High Frequency (200 kHz and above)
High-frequency sonar provides superior target separation and detail. It is particularly effective for identifying smaller objects and structures close to the boat. However, high-frequency signals have limited range and are more susceptible to interference, making them less suitable for deep water or turbid conditions. In shallow, clear water environments, high-frequency settings enhance the resolution of underwater images, allowing for precise identification of fish and structure contours. Example: locating individual fish within a tightly packed school of baitfish.
-
Low Frequency (50 kHz and below)
Low-frequency sonar offers greater range and penetration, making it advantageous for deep-water exploration and surveying large areas. While low frequencies sacrifice some detail and target separation, they are less affected by water clarity and can effectively penetrate sediment. This makes them ideal for identifying bottom contours and large underwater structures at considerable distances. Example: locating a submerged river channel or deep-water ledge in a large lake.
-
Dual Frequency (Simultaneous or Switchable)
Some sonar systems offer dual-frequency capability, allowing simultaneous or switchable operation at both high and low frequencies. This provides the user with the flexibility to optimize performance for varying conditions and targets. By simultaneously displaying data from both frequencies, the user can benefit from the detail of high frequency and the range of low frequency, improving overall situational awareness. Example: using high frequency to identify fish near the surface while simultaneously using low frequency to map the bottom structure.
-
Chirp (Compressed High-Intensity Radiated Pulse) Technology
CHIRP sonar technology utilizes a range of frequencies within a single pulse, providing enhanced target separation, clarity, and range compared to traditional single-frequency sonar. This technology sweeps through a range of frequencies rather than emitting a single frequency. This leads to better image quality, increased target definition, and less noise. CHIRP is particularly beneficial in identifying small targets and distinguishing them from clutter or other objects. Example: differentiating between individual fish within a large school or identifying small baitfish near the bottom.
In summary, selecting the appropriate frequency or frequency range is critical for maximizing the effectiveness of a fish finder. By understanding the characteristics and limitations of different frequencies, users can optimize their sonar settings to suit specific fishing conditions and target species, leading to more accurate interpretations of underwater data and improved fishing outcomes. In the context of understanding sonar data, frequency selection is the dial on the radio – finding the right station gives the clearest picture.
5. Gain adjustment
Gain adjustment, within the context of sonar technology, is the process of amplifying or attenuating the strength of the returning sonar signal. This control is integral to the effective interpretation of sonar data, acting as a filter that refines the clarity and detail displayed on the device. Improper gain settings can lead to misinterpretations and inaccurate assessments of the underwater environment.
-
Sensitivity Enhancement
Increasing the gain setting amplifies weaker signals, thereby enhancing the visibility of smaller targets or objects at greater distances. This can be particularly useful in deep water or when targeting fish that produce weak sonar returns. However, excessive gain can amplify noise and clutter, obscuring genuine targets. For example, in clear, deep water, a slight increase in gain might reveal subtle changes in bottom composition or the presence of small schools of baitfish that would otherwise be undetectable.
-
Clutter Reduction
Conversely, reducing the gain setting attenuates weaker signals, minimizing the display of noise, surface clutter, and other unwanted interference. This is crucial in shallow or turbid water, where excessive clutter can overwhelm the display and mask legitimate targets. A lower gain setting filters out these distractions, allowing for a clearer view of the underlying structures and larger fish targets. Imagine a scenario with significant surface turbulence; reducing the gain would help filter out the noise from the waves, allowing for a better view of what’s below.
-
Target Discrimination
Gain adjustment plays a significant role in distinguishing between different types of underwater objects. Stronger sonar returns, typically associated with hard objects like rocks or submerged structures, require lower gain settings to prevent signal saturation and maintain detail. Weaker returns, indicative of softer objects like vegetation or suspended particles, benefit from increased gain to enhance their visibility. The ability to fine-tune the gain allows the user to differentiate between various objects based on their signal strength and characteristics. Differentiating between a rocky outcrop and a school of fish might require subtle adjustment to the gain.
-
Environmental Adaptation
Optimal gain settings are highly dependent on environmental conditions, including water depth, clarity, and bottom composition. In clear, shallow water, lower gain settings are typically sufficient, while deeper, turbid water necessitates higher gain. Adjusting the gain to match the prevailing conditions is crucial for maintaining a clear and accurate display. Adjusting the gain while moving from a clear lake into a muddy river is a necessity for maintaining useful information on the display.
The effective use of gain adjustment is a critical skill for those seeking to accurately interpret sonar data. By understanding the relationship between gain settings, signal strength, and environmental conditions, users can optimize the performance of their sonar devices, leading to more informed decisions and improved fishing outcomes. Mastery of gain control transforms raw sonar data into a refined and actionable picture of the underwater environment, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of fish behavior and habitat.
6. Clutter reduction
Effective sonar interpretation hinges on the ability to discern relevant data from extraneous interference. Clutter reduction, therefore, represents a critical function in accurately interpreting information displayed on a sonar device.
-
Surface Clutter Suppression
Surface clutter, generated by wave action, aeration, and other disturbances at the water’s surface, can obscure sonar returns from underwater objects. Clutter reduction techniques, such as surface filters or adjustable gain settings, mitigate these effects, allowing for clearer visualization of targets beneath the surface. Without this suppression, it becomes difficult to differentiate between surface noise and the presence of fish or underwater structure. For example, in windy conditions, surface clutter can completely mask returns from shallow-water fish, rendering the sonar useless without proper adjustment.
-
Noise Filtering Techniques
Electronic noise, originating from the sonar unit itself or external sources such as trolling motors or other electronic devices, can contaminate sonar data. Noise filters, implemented through hardware or software, eliminate or reduce this interference, enhancing the clarity of the displayed information. The presence of noise compromises the accuracy of target identification and bottom mapping. On smaller vessels with multiple electronic devices in close proximity, noise filtering is often essential for obtaining a clean sonar signal.
-
Bottom Echo Discrimination
In shallow water, strong bottom echoes can create excessive clutter, making it difficult to distinguish between the seabed and other underwater objects. Clutter reduction algorithms can differentiate between bottom returns and other signals, improving the ability to identify fish or structure near the bottom. This is particularly important in areas with complex bottom topography, where subtle changes in depth or structure can be masked by strong bottom echoes. Anglers targeting bottom-dwelling species rely on effective bottom echo discrimination to accurately locate fish near the seabed.
-
Frequency Optimization for Clarity
Certain sonar frequencies are more susceptible to interference and clutter than others. Selecting an appropriate frequency, often in conjunction with other clutter reduction techniques, can minimize noise and improve target resolution. Higher frequencies, while providing greater detail, are more prone to surface clutter, while lower frequencies offer better penetration but may sacrifice detail. Understanding the trade-offs between frequency and clutter allows for optimal sonar performance in varying water conditions. When fishing in heavily vegetated areas, for example, selecting a lower frequency can reduce clutter caused by plant life, improving the ability to identify fish targets.
The facets of clutter reduction outlined above demonstrate its integral role in deciphering sonar data accurately. Effective implementation of these techniques enhances the user’s ability to identify fish, locate underwater structure, and navigate safely, transforming raw sonar signals into actionable information for both recreational and professional applications.
7. Temperature gradient
The presence and interpretation of temperature gradients, or thermoclines, are significant factors in understanding data displayed on sonar devices. Variations in water temperature create density differences that can be detected by sonar, influencing the behavior and distribution of fish. Understanding these patterns enhances the angler’s ability to locate productive fishing areas.
-
Thermocline Identification
A thermocline appears on a sonar display as a distinct band or line, often exhibiting a change in color intensity or clarity. This visual representation corresponds to the abrupt shift in water temperature. Identifying the thermocline’s depth and thickness is crucial. Sonar settings, such as gain and frequency, must be adjusted to clearly distinguish the temperature gradient from other underwater features. An example is observing a distinct line at a certain depth in a stratified lake, indicating a sharp temperature change that separates warmer surface waters from colder, deeper layers. Improperly calibrated sonar settings can obscure this critical information.
-
Fish Distribution and Behavior
Many fish species are temperature-sensitive and congregate within specific temperature ranges. The thermocline often acts as a barrier or gathering point, influencing fish distribution. Understanding the preferred temperature ranges of target species allows anglers to focus their efforts near the thermocline. For instance, in summer months, certain fish species might be found just above the thermocline where the water is cooler but still contains sufficient oxygen. Ignoring the temperature gradient can lead to inefficient fishing practices and reduced success.
-
Sonar Signal Reflection and Refraction
Temperature gradients can affect the path and intensity of sonar signals. The change in water density associated with a thermocline can cause sonar waves to reflect or refract, potentially creating shadow zones or distorting sonar returns. Compensating for these effects is important for accurate interpretation. For example, sonar signals may be weaker below the thermocline due to refraction, requiring adjustments to gain settings to improve visibility. Failure to account for these signal distortions can lead to misinterpretations of bottom structure and fish locations.
-
Seasonal Variations
The depth and intensity of the thermocline vary seasonally. In spring and fall, temperature gradients may be less pronounced, while in summer, they are typically more distinct. Adapting sonar interpretation strategies to account for these seasonal changes is necessary. In early spring, the absence of a strong thermocline means fish distribution may be more uniform throughout the water column. Adjusting search patterns and sonar settings based on seasonal temperature profiles maximizes fishing efficiency.
In conclusion, integrating an understanding of temperature gradients with sonar interpretation skills enhances the effectiveness of underwater exploration and fish location. Recognizing thermoclines on sonar displays, understanding their impact on fish behavior, and accounting for their influence on sonar signals are essential components of advanced sonar usage. This knowledge transforms raw sonar data into a comprehensive understanding of the underwater environment.
8. Depth reading
Accurate depth reading is a foundational element of sonar interpretation. The ability to determine the distance from the transducer to the bottom, as well as the depth of objects within the water column, is crucial for understanding the underwater environment. Erroneous depth readings can lead to navigational hazards and misidentification of underwater structures, thereby compromising the effective use of sonar data. Understanding depth is a prerequisite for accurately assessing the size and relative position of fish and other objects detected by the sonar. For instance, a seemingly large target near the surface might be a small fish, while a faint return at a significant depth could indicate a much larger creature. The relationship between perceived size and depth is essential for effective target identification.
Practical application of accurate depth reading extends to various scenarios. In navigation, knowing the precise depth prevents grounding in shallow waters and ensures safe passage through channels. For angling, depth readings facilitate targeting fish species that inhabit specific depth ranges. An angler seeking bottom-dwelling fish must accurately determine the depth to position their bait effectively. Furthermore, knowledge of depth is essential for interpreting the bottom contour. Changes in depth indicate slopes, drop-offs, or submerged structures that may serve as fish habitats. Identifying these features requires a precise understanding of the depth profile.
In summary, depth reading is an indispensable aspect of sonar interpretation. Its accuracy directly influences navigation safety, fishing success, and the overall understanding of the underwater environment. Challenges in accurate depth assessment, such as signal interference or improper transducer placement, must be addressed to maximize the effectiveness of sonar technology. Accurate depth information ensures the fidelity of all other sonar readings, connecting directly to the broader theme of maximizing the utility of these devices.
9. Target separation
Target separation refers to the ability of a sonar system to distinguish between individual objects or organisms within close proximity. This capability is a critical component of how to read fish finder data accurately. Without adequate target separation, closely grouped objects will appear as a single, larger mass on the sonar display, obscuring the individual nature of the targets. The effectiveness of target separation directly impacts the user’s ability to discern fish from structure, or to identify multiple fish within a school. This, in turn, affects the precision with which anglers can target specific fish species or understand the composition of underwater environments. For example, if a school of baitfish is clustered tightly around a submerged log, poor target separation would render the log and the baitfish as a single, indistinguishable return, preventing the angler from effectively targeting predatory fish that might be lurking nearby.
Modern sonar technologies employ various techniques to improve target separation. Higher frequency sonar tends to offer better resolution and, therefore, superior target separation capabilities. CHIRP (Compressed High-Intensity Radiated Pulse) technology, which utilizes a range of frequencies, also enhances target separation by providing more detailed information about the size, shape, and density of objects. Practical application involves adjusting sonar settings to optimize target separation based on the specific environment and targets of interest. In shallow water with numerous submerged obstacles, increasing the sonar frequency and employing CHIRP technology can help to distinguish individual fish from the surrounding vegetation or rocks. Conversely, in deep water, the focus may shift to detecting larger structures, where target separation is less critical than range and overall signal clarity.
In conclusion, target separation is an essential element in the broader understanding of sonar data interpretation. It directly influences the accuracy with which underwater objects and organisms can be identified, leading to improved fishing outcomes and a greater understanding of the aquatic environment. While challenges remain in achieving optimal target separation in all conditions, advancements in sonar technology continue to improve this capability, enhancing the value of sonar as a tool for underwater exploration and resource management. The effectiveness of interpreting sonar data is inextricably linked to the precision with which individual targets can be differentiated.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common queries regarding the interpretation of data displayed on sonar devices, facilitating a more comprehensive understanding of the information provided.
Question 1: Is there a universal method for interpreting all sonar displays, regardless of manufacturer or model?
While the fundamental principles of sonar operation remain consistent, display conventions and settings can vary considerably between manufacturers and models. Familiarization with the specific device’s user manual is essential for accurate interpretation.
Question 2: How can one distinguish between a fish and other underwater objects on a sonar screen?
Fish typically appear as arches or lines, reflecting their movement through the sonar beam. Stationary objects tend to produce more consistent and stable returns. However, factors such as sonar frequency, gain settings, and water conditions can influence the appearance of these returns, requiring careful analysis.
Question 3: What impact does water clarity have on the performance and interpretation of sonar data?
Water clarity significantly affects sonar signal penetration. Turbid water reduces signal range and clarity, potentially obscuring targets. Adjusting sonar frequency and gain settings can help mitigate these effects, but limitations remain.
Question 4: Is specialized training required to effectively interpret sonar data for fishing or navigation?
While formal training is not always mandatory, practical experience and a thorough understanding of sonar principles are essential for accurate interpretation. Experimentation with different settings and careful observation of sonar returns in various conditions are highly recommended.
Question 5: What are the common sources of error in sonar depth readings, and how can they be addressed?
Common errors include signal interference, improper transducer placement, and incorrect offset settings. Ensuring proper installation, minimizing electronic interference, and calibrating the device according to the manufacturer’s instructions are critical for accurate depth readings.
Question 6: How frequently should a sonar unit be calibrated to maintain accuracy and reliability?
Calibration frequency depends on the device’s specifications and usage patterns. Generally, performing a calibration check at the beginning of each season and after any significant impacts or repairs is advisable. Consult the user manual for specific recommendations.
Accurate interpretation of sonar data demands a synthesis of theoretical knowledge, practical experience, and meticulous attention to detail. Continuous learning and adaptation are essential for maximizing the utility of sonar technology.
The next article section will delve into advanced sonar techniques and strategies for further optimizing underwater data analysis.
Navigational and Angling Improvement Guide
This guide provides empirically derived tips to enhance the proficiency in interpreting sonar displays, optimizing both navigational safety and angling success.
Tip 1: Establish a Baseline: Prior to initiating targeted searches, operate the sonar in a known environment to establish a reference point. Analyze bottom composition, water clarity, and signal returns to calibrate visual interpretation skills.
Tip 2: Prioritize Transducer Placement: The transducer’s location significantly impacts sonar performance. Ensure obstruction-free mounting, adhering to manufacturer’s guidelines to minimize signal interference and maximize data accuracy.
Tip 3: Optimize Frequency Selection: Adjust the sonar frequency based on water depth and target size. Higher frequencies provide superior detail but limited range, while lower frequencies offer greater penetration but reduced resolution. Select the appropriate frequency to maximize target detection and separation.
Tip 4: Implement Gain Calibration Protocols: Regularly calibrate the sonar gain to compensate for varying water conditions and target reflectivity. Over-amplification introduces noise, while under-amplification obscures subtle returns. Establish standardized gain settings for different environmental conditions.
Tip 5: Integrate GPS Data: Utilize integrated GPS functionality to mark productive locations and establish navigational waypoints. This allows for precise return trips and facilitates the creation of underwater maps, enhancing long-term navigational and angling efficiency.
Tip 6: Analyze Bottom Contour Variations: Focus on subtle changes in bottom contour, indicating structure, drop-offs, and potential fish holding areas. Recognize that fish congregate in areas offering shelter or access to food sources. Map bottom changes and compare against fish patterns over time.
Tip 7: Continuously Refine Interpretive Skills: Regular practice and observation are essential for improving sonar interpretation skills. Analyze sonar returns in diverse environments, correlating visual data with real-world observations to refine predictive abilities.
Proficient sonar interpretation requires adherence to established protocols and a commitment to continuous learning. These skills enhance navigational safety, maximize angling success, and facilitate a deeper understanding of the underwater environment.
The article concludes with a review of advanced sonar technologies and techniques for experienced users seeking to further enhance their expertise.
Conclusion
The preceding analysis has detailed the critical elements in sonar data interpretation. Mastery of these elements, including recognizing fish arches, understanding bottom hardness, identifying structure location, frequency selection, gain adjustment, clutter reduction, temperature gradients, depth reading, and target separation, equips individuals with the knowledge necessary for effective underwater exploration and angling. The ability to accurately decipher these signals translates to improved navigational safety, targeted fishing efforts, and a deeper understanding of aquatic environments.
Continued advancement in sonar technology promises even greater clarity and detail in underwater imaging. The commitment to ongoing education and practical application remains crucial for maximizing the potential of these devices. As sonar capabilities evolve, so too must the user’s interpretive skills, ensuring that technology serves as a powerful tool for responsible and informed interaction with the marine world. The effectiveness in how to read fish finder will have further benefit as time goes on.
